Refractive lens exchange (RLE), sometimes called clear lens exchange, is an elective surgical procedure in which the eye’s natural crystalline lens is removed and replaced with an artificial intraocular lens (IOL) to correct refractive error. The technique is virtually identical to cataract surgery but is performed when the natural lens is still clear; the primary aim is to reduce or eliminate dependence on spectacles for distance, intermediate and, depending on the lens chosen, near tasks. Patients who consider RLE commonly seek a long-term solution to presbyopia or high refractive errors that are unsuitable for corneal laser procedures.
These video testimonials offer a genuine look into what makes eye surgery in the Czech Republic so highly regarded. Our patients share their personal experiences travelling to Prague, undergoing surgery with Sandonia, and enjoying life-changing results. From the professionalism of our medical teams to the smooth process and exceptional outcomes, you'll see why the Czech Republic has become a leading destination for high-quality, affordable eye care. Watch their stories – and find out what sets us apart.
The operation is usually carried out under topical anaesthetic drops with optional mild oral sedation and as a day-case. The surgeon creates a small corneal incision, removes the crystalline lens using phacoemulsification, and inserts a folded IOL into the capsular bag. The process typically takes around 15–30 minutes per eye, though the overall clinic appointment is longer because of preoperative checks and postoperative observation. Visual improvement can be noticed within days, with further refinement over weeks as the eye recovers and the brain adapts to the new optics.
RLE is most commonly offered to patients in their late 40s to 70s who are experiencing presbyopia, have very high short- or long-sight prescriptions, or have corneal characteristics that make laser options like LASIK or PRK unsuitable. It is also considered by people who prefer a predictable refractive outcome and those who wish to avoid the future need for cataract surgery by removing the natural lens proactively. Suitability depends on a thorough assessment of corneal shape, retinal health, axial length measurements, anterior chamber depth and realistic expectations about visual outcomes and possible need for spectacles for specific tasks.
A wide spectrum of IOLs is available, from standard monofocal implants that reliably correct distance vision to multifocal, trifocal and extended depth-of-focus designs that aim to provide a broader range of unaided vision. Toric IOLs correct pre-existing astigmatism, and some premium lenses incorporate enhanced optics to improve intermediate tasks such as computer work. Each lens type involves trade-offs: monofocals generally offer excellent quality of distance vision with fewer optical side effects but usually require reading spectacles, while multifocal and extended depth options can reduce spectacle dependence but may increase the likelihood of glare, haloes or reduced contrast sensitivity, particularly at night.
RLE can offer a reliable reduction in spectacle dependence for distance and, in many cases, intermediate and near vision when premium lenses are selected. The operation provides a permanent solution in the sense that the natural lens is removed, so the treated eye will not develop a visually significant cataract in the future. For patients with very high prescriptions, thin corneas or other corneal irregularities that preclude corneal refractive surgery, RLE presents an effective alternative. When careful biometric assessment and appropriate lens selection are employed, refractive outcomes tend to be predictable and stable, delivering significant improvements in quality of life for many patients.
RLE is an intraocular procedure and therefore carries the same spectrum of risks as cataract surgery. Potential complications include posterior capsule opacification that may later require a simple YAG laser capsulotomy, infection inside the eye (endophthalmitis), retinal detachment, cystoid macular oedema and unpredictable visual symptoms such as glare, haloes or reduced contrast, especially with multifocal implants. There is also the possibility of residual refractive error that may necessitate enhancement procedures or spectacle correction for specific tasks. Because the procedure is elective for patients with a clear lens, weighing the potential visual benefits against the invasiveness and rare but serious complications is a critical part of the decision-making process.
Compared with corneal laser surgery, RLE addresses refractive error at the level of the lens rather than reshaping the cornea, which makes it preferable for older patients, those with very high prescriptions or abnormal corneal anatomy. Unlike LASIK, RLE is inherently more invasive, with a recovery that can be longer and different optical trade-offs. In comparison with cataract surgery the surgical steps are the same, but the indication differs: cataract surgery treats a cloudy lens that impairs vision, whereas RLE is performed electively to correct refractive error while the lens is still clear. One practical advantage of RLE is the elimination of future cataract development in the treated eye.
Most patients experience a noticeable improvement in vision within a few days, though complete visual stabilisation and neuroadaptation to the new IOL may take several weeks. Postoperative care typically involves topical antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drops, and scheduled reviews to assess intraocular pressure, inflammation and retinal status. Some patients will require a simple secondary procedure such as a YAG laser capsulotomy months or years later to treat posterior capsule opacification. It is important to attend all follow-up appointments and to report any sudden changes in vision, pain or light sensitivity promptly.
RLE is usually an elective, self-funded treatment, so costs vary depending on the clinic, the surgeon and the choice of premium IOL. The overall financial package should be understood in full, including preoperative assessments, the operation, postoperative visits and the possibility of future procedures or enhancements. Practical factors such as time off work, staged surgery for each eye and travel arrangements for follow-up should be discussed during planning. Patients should also verify what is included in the quoted price and whether any warranty or enhancement policies apply.
Deciding on RLE should be the result of comprehensive counselling that covers lens options, expected functional vision (distance, intermediate, near), night-time vision expectations and the full spectrum of risks. Ask how a chosen IOL performs for tasks that matter to you, what the surgeon’s complication and satisfaction rates are, and what contingency plans exist for residual refractive error. Consider whether you are comfortable trading potential optical phenomena for reduced spectacle dependence and whether you have realistic expectations about outcomes.
Refractive lens exchange is a powerful option for patients seeking to reduce reliance on spectacles, especially where corneal techniques are unsuitable or where presbyopia management is desired. It offers long-term refractive stability and the additional effect of preventing future cataract formation in the treated eye. However, it remains an intraocular operation with meaningful trade-offs and a small risk of sight-threatening complications. The right choice depends on individual anatomy, lifestyle priorities and careful, personalised advice from an experienced refractive surgeon. Arrange a detailed consultation to explore whether RLE aligns with your visual goals and to obtain a plan tailored to your eyes.